One study only paved way for chlorpyrifos

The EU-approval of the pesticide chlorpyrifos was based on one single study concerning possible damages on the developing brain, commissioned by the producer Dow in 1998. Dow has been asked to provide a new study on developmental neurotoxicity, but rejected to comply.

By Nils Mulvad and Staffan Dahllöf

A spokesperson for EFSA (European Food Safety Agency) says to Le Monde:

“We can confirm that during the evaluation of chlorpyrifos in 2013 the only one available study on developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) was from 1998 and had several limitations (e.g. lack of findings in the positive control, exposure period from gestational day 6 to lactation day 11 (instead of 21), lower number of individuals for neuropathology (6 instead of 10) and for learning and memory (8 instead of 10), etc.).”

Spain is acting as the Rapporteur Member State for the UE in the renewal procedure which will end in January 2020. In 2013, Spain’s experts asked the applicant to provide a new developmental neurotoxicity study.

Dow refuses to comply

Corteva Agriscience former known as Dow Agriscience saw no point in complying with EFSA’s request.

”We believe a second developmental neurotoxicity study is unnecessary; the information generated from the original developmental neurotoxicity study, as well as a new study conducted on chlorpyrifos methyl, is sufficient to conclude that there is no indication of an unknown mechanism on the developing nervous system,” József Máté, Corporate Communications Leader, Corteva/Dow explains in a mail to Le Monde.

In April 2019, the lack of studies and data was discussed in depth as part of the ongoing peer review of chlorpyrifos and chlorpyrifos-methyl at an experts’ meeting in EFSA. The experts took note of the highly critical article by environmental scientists Mie, Rudén and Grandjean, quoted and described in the investigation ”Chlorpyrifos the unknown pesticide”.

The EFSA spokesperson concludes:

”With the new dossier, the applicant has not clarified any of the data gaps or concerns expressed in the former risk assessment in regards to DNT (developmental neurotoxicity) and has not provided a new study, since it considers that there is no added benefit of conducting additional animal studies to explore the apparent potential of acting on the developing nervous system through unknown mechanisms.”

For Nils Mulvad, this was reason to start a cross-border investigative project to uncovere the hidden, dangerous effects of the pesticide chlorpyrifos; ‘The scientific world agreed on its toxicity for the brain of the unborn and young children, but the pesticide, after being cleared by the relevant authorities in 2005, was nevertheless authorized for sale in the EU. Journalists revealed that some key scientific findings had never been taken into consideration at the time of the initial marketing authorization of chlorpyrifos. Although the single study concerning its neurotoxicity for the developing brain, which was funded by its manufacturer, had actually found adverse effects, this information had never been addressed by the EU authorities. Finally, in the beginning of December 2019, after the scientific evidence was reviewed and acknowledged by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the Member States decided to ban chlorpyrifos for use in Europe.’

The project on chlorpyrifos was first published 17th of June 2019 in EUObserver covering warnings from scientists because of its effect on humans, spread of the poison in food, the legal battle in EU and the fact that it was becoming banned in more and more countries. At the same time, market analysts predict the market to expand in the next five years. Chlorpyrifos might be banned in the EU from the beginning of next year. During the following week, we will publish several stories from this impressive investigation.

For an introduction of the team members, see here.

Photo: Spraying pesticides on lettuce. – © Jeff Vanuga / NRCS


Support the exchange of international journalism with a donation of any size

Your support helps protect the storybank, an independent platform which encourages and facilitates the exchange of journalistic publications worldwide. It means a great deal to us if we can, with your help, deliver a fully operating and innovative tool to provide quality journalism for everyone, wherever you are and from wherever the stories come. Support us based on what you feel this article is worth to you.

Related posts